<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode #3: Predictions, Predictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2007/02/episode-3-falsifiability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2007/02/episode-3-falsifiability/</link>
	<description>Psychology podcast and resources for students and educators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:27:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: christina tran</title>
		<link>http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2007/02/episode-3-falsifiability/comment-page-1/#comment-3848</link>
		<dc:creator>christina tran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2007/02/11/episode-3-falsifiability/#comment-3848</guid>
		<description>not all predictions are good some can also be very good, i guess it all just depends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not all predictions are good some can also be very good, i guess it all just depends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Mongare</title>
		<link>http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2007/02/episode-3-falsifiability/comment-page-1/#comment-2172</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Mongare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2007/02/11/episode-3-falsifiability/#comment-2172</guid>
		<description>Actually nobody knows what is going to happen sometimes later in their lives but there are many predictions that are made in  life of which some do not really happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually nobody knows what is going to happen sometimes later in their lives but there are many predictions that are made in  life of which some do not really happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Stager</title>
		<link>http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2007/02/episode-3-falsifiability/comment-page-1/#comment-1563</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Stager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2007/02/11/episode-3-falsifiability/#comment-1563</guid>
		<description>Some predictions can be false but then again they are just predictions. I think the time variable definitely has a big effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some predictions can be false but then again they are just predictions. I think the time variable definitely has a big effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Parola</title>
		<link>http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2007/02/episode-3-falsifiability/comment-page-1/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Parola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2007/02/11/episode-3-falsifiability/#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>when he made the meteor coment i actually felt that it was so specific that there is no way it could happen. so is it possible to be too specific on a prediction to make it false? i understand many people like specific predictions, but how do you test or measure it pre- event? the vauge is also hard to measure and test if not specific enough so how do you know what is a true  prediction or what to believe if it is hard to test? is it just a wait and see what happens or is there ways to test these more specific or overly vauge predictions? because it seems that only ones that fall in between are testable to me so i am trying to understand the importance of predictions if many cant be tested. but that may be a lack on my understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when he made the meteor coment i actually felt that it was so specific that there is no way it could happen. so is it possible to be too specific on a prediction to make it false? i understand many people like specific predictions, but how do you test or measure it pre- event? the vauge is also hard to measure and test if not specific enough so how do you know what is a true  prediction or what to believe if it is hard to test? is it just a wait and see what happens or is there ways to test these more specific or overly vauge predictions? because it seems that only ones that fall in between are testable to me so i am trying to understand the importance of predictions if many cant be tested. but that may be a lack on my understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Lamb</title>
		<link>http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2007/02/episode-3-falsifiability/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Lamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2007/02/11/episode-3-falsifiability/#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>I think this is true. Good predictions can be false and bad predictions can be good in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is true. Good predictions can be false and bad predictions can be good in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

